Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR): An Underutilized Approach to Address Surgical Disparities.

Disparities are well-documented across the continuum of surgical care. Counteracting such disparities requires new multidisciplinary approaches that utilize the expertise of affected individuals, such as community-based participatory research (CBPR). CBPR is an approach to research that is anchored in equitable, sustainable community-academic partnerships, and has been shown to improve intervention implementation and outcomes. In this article, community stakeholders and researchers outline the principles and benefits of CBPR, examples of CBPR in trauma and transplant, and future directions for CBPR within surgery.

Chronic kidney disease, physical activity and cognitive function in older adults-results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014).

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is common among persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD), due in part to reduced kidney function. Given that physical activity (PA) is known to mitigate cognitive decline, we examined whether associations between CKD stage and global/domain-specific cognitive function differ by PA. METHODS: We leveraged 3223 participants (≥60 years of age) enrolled in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2011-2014), with at least one measure of objective cognitive function [immediate recall (CERAD-WL), delayed recall (CERAD-DR), verbal fluency (AF), executive function/processing speed (DSST), global (average of four tests) or self-perceived memory decline (SCD)]. We quantified the association between CKD stage {no CKD: estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and albuminuria [albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR)] <30 mg/g; stages G1-G3: eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and ACR ≥30 mg/g or eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2; stages G4 and G5: eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2} and cognitive function using linear regression (objective measures) and logistic regression (SCD), accounting for sampling weights for nationally representative estimates. We tested whether associations differed by PA [Global Physical Activity Questionnaire, high PA ≥600 metabolic equivalent of task (MET) · min/week versus low PA <600 MET · min/week] using a Wald test. RESULTS: Among NHANES participants, 34.9% had CKD stages G1-G3, 2.6% had stages G4 and G5 and 50.7% had low PA. CKD stages G4 and G5 were associated with lower global cognitive function {difference = -0.38 standard deviation [SD] [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.62 to -0.15]}. This association differed by PA (Pinteraction = 0.01). Specifically, among participants with low PA, those with CKD stages G4 and G5 had lower global cognitive function [difference = -0.57 SD (95% CI -0.82 to -0.31)] compared with those without CKD. Among those with high PA, no difference was found [difference = 0.10 SD (95% CI -0.29-0.49)]. Similarly, the CKD stage was only associated with immediate recall, verbal fluency, executive function and processing speed among those with low PA; no associations were observed for delayed recall or self-perceived memory decline. CONCLUSIONS: CKD is associated with lower objective cognitive function among those with low but not high PA. Clinicians should consider screening older patients with CKD who have low PA for cognitive impairment and encourage them to meet PA guidelines.

SGLT2 Inhibition for CKD and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: Report of a Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.

Diabetes is the most frequent cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to nearly half of all cases of kidney failure requiring replacement therapy. The principal cause of death among patients with diabetes and CKD is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were developed to lower blood glucose levels by inhibiting glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule. In clinical trials designed to demonstrate the CVD safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), consistent reductions in risks for secondary kidney disease end points (albuminuria and a composite of serum creatinine doubling or 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, kidney failure, or death), along with reductions in CVD events, were observed. In patients with CKD, the kidney and CVD benefits of canagliflozin were established by the CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial in patients with T2DM, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 To clarify and support the role of SGLT2 inhibitors for treatment of T2DM and CKD, the National Kidney Foundation convened a scientific workshop with an international panel of more than 80 experts. They discussed the current state of knowledge and unanswered questions in order to propose therapeutic approaches and delineate future research. SGLT2 inhibitors improve glomerular hemodynamic function and are thought to ameliorate other local and systemic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of CKD and CVD. SGLT2 inhibitors should be used when possible by people with T2DM to reduce risks for CKD and CVD in alignment with the clinical trial entry criteria. Important risks of SGLT2 inhibitors include euglycemic ketoacidosis, genital mycotic infections, and volume depletion. Careful consideration should be given to the balance of benefits and harms of SGLT2 inhibitors and risk mitigation strategies. Effective implementation strategies are needed to achieve widespread use of these life-saving medications.

SGLT2 Inhibition for CKD and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: Report of a Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.

Diabetes is the most frequent cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to nearly half of all cases of kidney failure requiring replacement therapy. The principal cause of death among patients with diabetes and CKD is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were developed to lower blood glucose levels by inhibiting glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule. In clinical trials designed to demonstrate the CVD safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), consistent reductions in risks for secondary kidney disease end points (albuminuria and a composite of serum creatinine doubling or 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, kidney failure, or death), along with reductions in CVD events, were observed. In patients with CKD, the kidney and CVD benefits of canagliflozin were established by the CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial in patients with T2DM, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio>300mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to<90mL/min/1.73m2. To clarify and support the role of SGLT2 inhibitors for treatment of T2DM and CKD, the National Kidney Foundation convened a scientific workshop with an international panel of more than 80 experts. They discussed the current state of knowledge and unanswered questions to propose therapeutic approaches and delineate future research. SGLT2 inhibitors improve glomerular hemodynamic function and are thought to ameliorate other local and systemic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of CKD and CVD. SGLT2 inhibitors should be used when possible by people with T2DM to reduce risks for CKD and CVD in alignment with the clinical trial entry criteria. Important risks of SGLT2 inhibitors include euglycemic ketoacidosis, genital mycotic infections, and volume depletion. Careful consideration should be given to the balance of benefits and harms of SGLT2 inhibitors and risk mitigation strategies. Effective implementation strategies are needed to achieve widespread use of these life-saving medications.

A Patient Decision Support Tool for Hepatitis C Virus and CKD Treatment.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patient education and decision support tools could facilitate decisions around the timing of antiviral therapy in patients living with both hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We previously developed a tool through the HELP (Helping Empower Liver and Kidney Patients) study. This article evaluates the preliminary efficacy and usability of the tool among participants with both HCV infection and CKD. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post study pilot evaluation. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Participants were at least 18 years old, were English speaking, and had a diagnosis of chronic HCV infection and CKD; they were seen in CKD clinics, dialysis units, and/or hepatology and liver transplantation clinics. INTERVENTION: Electronic patient decision support tool. OUTCOMES: Participants' change in knowledge, certainty about choice, decision self-efficacy, patients' treatment preferences, and tool usability. RESULTS: 70 participants were recruited; 56 of 70 (80.0%) completed study procedures. Nearly all (51/56; 91.1%) requested paper-based study procedures despite the electronic design of the tool. Participants reported that they were most worried about the following treatment factors: (1) cost of drugs to treat HCV infection, (2) how their HCV infection affected their CKD, and (3) wait times for a kidney transplant. After using the decision tool, participants had significantly higher HCV infection and CKD knowledge (mean posttest percent of questions answered correctly = 65.74% vs pretest percent of questions answered correctly = 53.44%; P < 0.001) and more certainty about choice (mean posttest = 3.13 vs pretest = 2.65; P = 0.05). There were no significant changes in decision self-efficacy (mean posttest = 86.62 vs pretest = 84.68; P = 0.48). LIMITATIONS: Single-site pilot study to explore preliminary tool efficacy and usability. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a decision tool may support informed patient-centered choices among patients with HCV infection and CKD. Future studies should evaluate ways to improve care decisions in a larger sample using both paper-based and electronic materials. FUNDING: Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov with study number NCT03426787.